Idiomatic Truths Are Often Only Half-Truths

In the echo chambers of casual conversation, we toss idioms back and forth. But have we ever thought they are only half-truths? Look at the following full sentences.

“Jack of all trades, master of none, but oftentimes better than a master of one" –Robert Greene (1592).
Dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum ("I doubt, therefore I think, therefore I am”) –Rene Descartes (1637).
“The blood of the covenant is thicker than the water of the womb” –Sir Walter Scott (1815).

Today we use them like worn out coins, rarely pausing to examine what's been worn away. Many of our most cherished expressions are mere fragments, diminished echoes of more complex thoughts. The truncation of these idioms isn't merely a linguistic curiosity—it represents a fundamental reshaping of cultural wisdom, often inverting the very lessons these sayings were meant to impart.

Recovering what is gone can be the most progressive act of all.

Consider the dismissive label "Jack of all trades, master of none." In our hyper-specialised society, we wield this phrase as a critique, suggesting that versatility inherently lacks depth. Yet the complete expression—"Jack of all trades, master of none, but oftentimes better than a master of one"—offers a radically different perspective. The full idiom celebrates the adaptable generalist, suggesting that breadth of knowledge carries its own profound value, often surpassing narrow expertise. In truncating this wisdom, we've enshrined specialisation while disregarding the advantages of versatility that the original saying sought to honour.

This pattern of convenient abbreviation extends into philosophical terrain. Descartes' famous "Cogito, ergo sum" ("I think, therefore I am") appears in many discussions as a cornerstone of rational thought. Yet the more complete formulation, "Dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum" ("I doubt, therefore I think, therefore I am"), places skepticism at the foundation of existence itself. By dropping "dubito," we've transformed a radical endorsement of questioning into a mere statement of being. The omission subtly shifts the philosophical emphasis from critical inquiry to mere consciousness—a far less challenging proposition.

Perhaps most striking is how we've inverted the meaning of "Blood is thicker than water." This abbreviated form has become a battle cry for family loyalty above all else. Yet the original—"The blood of the covenant is thicker than the water of the womb"—suggests precisely the opposite: that bonds formed through choice and commitment can supersede those dictated by birth. This particular truncation doesn't merely simplify; it fundamentally reverses the wisdom being offered, transforming a celebration of chosen bonds into an anthem for biological determinism.

These abbreviations are not random. They reflect and reinforce the values our society wishes to prioritise—specialisation over versatility, certainty over doubt, inherited connection over chosen commitment. Each shortened form streamlines complexity into something more palatable to contemporary sensibilities. Yet in doing so, we lose the counterbalance, the nuance, the productive tension that makes wisdom worth preserving.

What other half-truths do we exchange daily, believing them to be complete? What ancient wisdom have we reshaped to better suit our modern predispositions? The examples above should prompt us to approach received wisdom with healthy skepticism. When someone offers an idiom as definitive truth, we might ask: Is this the complete thought? What has been discarded, and why?

The restoration of these idioms to their fuller forms offers more than linguistic satisfaction—it provides an opportunity to recover lost perspectives. In remembering that the Jack of all trades might indeed be better than a master of one, we reclaim the value of versatility in an age of specialisation. In acknowledging that doubt precedes thought, we honour skepticism as the foundation of knowledge rather than its enemy. Embracing the complexity of these complete idioms might be precisely the wisdom we need.

These complete idioms challenge us to expand our thinking beyond the convenient half-truths we've inherited. Perhaps most importantly, they demonstrate that looking backward—recovering what has been lost—can sometimes be the most progressive act of all.

Comments

New Year, New Beginning

The past year was different to different people. Some of us were very successful, won every battle we fought. Some others of us did not win every battle that we fought, might have found difficult even to get up from bed everyday, we just survived. But for both it is a new year. For those very successful, it is time to stand on the ground and not be overconfident, complacent, arrogant and egoistic. And it is also time to give back. And for those of us not very successful we have another new year with 365 blank pages, 365 blank days. It is a fresh new beginning. Start your dream and go all the way. “There are two mistakes one can make along the road to truth—not going all the way, and not starting”, said Buddha. Every New Year tells that we cannot eternally postpone important things in our lives. We must begin somewhere. How many lives do we have on this earth? One, two, three, four, or more? One of the foremost thinkers and philosophers of China, Confucius, four centuries before ...

2025 Must Create Its Own Art

People are afraid of art, because real art brings the question and the answer into your house. Tonight’s art becomes inadequate and useless when the sun rises in the morning. The mistake lies not in creating art for tonight, but in assuming tonight’s answers will serve tomorrow’s questions. Louise Bourgeois, a French American artist, reflected, “art is a guaranty of sanity;” but that guarantee must be renewed with each dawn, each cultural shift, and each evolution of human consciousness. If some art endures through generations, it is only because of its capacity to speak, its ability to demand fresh interpretations that test and challenge the new. To guarantee sanity in the coming year, 2025 must create its own art. Why create art? Why watch art? Why read literature? True art, in the words of Sunil P Ilayidam, shakes that which is rigid and unchangeable. Art serves as humanity’s persistent earthquake, destabilising comfortable certainties and creating space for new ways of...

Inter-religious Sensitivity in the Time of Covid-19

I was religiously pleased and humanly excited to read the story of a Hindu doctor reciting Kalima Shahada for a dying Muslim Covid patient in Kerala. Beevathu, 56 year old, was all isolated from her family in a covid ward. She had been there for 17 days, she was on a ventilator, and it was increasingly clear that there was no hope. After the consent from her family she was taken off from the ventilator. Beevathu lies there between life and death. Nothing more to happen. But like any good dying Muslim, she perhaps wanted to hear the Kalima Shahada (the Islamic oath of faith) to be chanted to her by one of her family members; but there was none, the situation made it so. Dr. Rekha, a Hindu doctor, was attending to her all these days. She knew what was happening, and she also knew what was not happening. Dr. Rekha knew the words of Kalima Shahada , thanks to her upbringing in UAE. She went close to Beevathu’s bed chanted into her ears, “ La ilaha illallah Muhammadur rasulullah...

Human Empowerment Vs Technological Determinism

This article, Seeking truth in a barrage of biases , presents an inspiring call to action for maintaining our intellectual autonomy in the digital age. Written by J Jehoson Jiresh, it addresses the critical challenge of navigating through algorithmic biases and misinformation while offering hope and practical solutions. The author beautifully frames our modern predicament - how even a simple online search for running shoes can shape our digital landscape - and transforms this everyday observation into a powerful message about reclaiming our agency in the digital world. What's particularly inspiring is the article's emphasis on human empowerment rather than technological determinism. The article presents three key strategies for hope and change: Active critical engagement to question assumptions and challenge biases Seeking diverse perspectives to break free from our echo chambers Demanding transparency and accountability in algorithmic systems Most uplifting is the article...

Fine Ways of Disregarding Vital Issues

Observing the preoccupations of Pharisees, scribes and religious leaders of his time (Mark 7: 1-23) Jesus commended that they have fine ways of disregarding the commandments of God in order to maintain human traditions and interests. They put aside weightier matters to uphold human decrees. In modern politics we hear the jargon, ‘politics of distraction’. In a country of mass illiteracy and unemployment, farmers’ suicide, etc. politicians and other key people divert public attention by discussing building temples, girls wearing hijab to college, etc. Noam Chomsky, an American social commentator says, “The key element of social control is the strategy of distraction that is to divert public attention from important issues and changes decided by political and economic elites, through the technique of flood or flooding continuous distractions and insignificant information.” The corrupt politicians must have learned this strategy from the pickpockets (or is it visa versa): they di...

Religion Must Help Greater Acceptance And Not Control

What if you see people who never came to your church or never were part of the universal Church found with God; forgiven by god, loved by god, helped by god, and even pampered by god? Our average human spirit and mind will feel a bit of discomfort and repulsion. That exactly is what is happening with apostle John in Mark 9: 38-41. Membership in a religion in many phases in history, and religious practices like praying, church-going etc. has become tools and means of exercising superiority and control over others, or it becomes a means to exclude people. In the name of religion and religious practices we take control of what can be done, who can do it, what is good and bad, what is moral and what is immoral. This approach creates an exclusive moral, good, pure, and authentic race or people or group. We keep doing it as individuals and institutions for the fear of losing control over others. And that is the end of humanity. Stopping others from doing good comes from a sickening clo...

Awesomeness Vs. Negativity

Some people are awesome. You know them by their presence. They bring happiness wherever they go. They stand with those who do good. They promote and recognise others’ thoughts and contribution. They appreciate people. They attempt to find answers and solutions to questions and problems. Others doing better and bigger things do not threaten or make them insecure. The opposite of awesomeness in social conduct is negativity. Stay away from people who have a question for every answer; and has a problem with every solution you find. Jesus went around doing good in every possible manner: he healed the sick, he fed the hungry. The Pharisees definitely felt threatened and insecure. They try to act out their authority (Mark 8:11-13); and asked Jesus for a heavenly sign. Jesus’ mind and ministry did not get stuck in the negativities around him. He did not get sucked into the drama the Pharisees were staging. He sighed and got on to the other shore. There he continued to do good. Jesus giv...

Zacchaeus’ Last Will

Zacchaeus, as we know, was a chief tax collector and a rich man (Luke 19: 1-10). He, as any tax collectors of his time would do, used to collect much more than due, even by force and violence. Now we might say, in a very self-justifying manner, that I am not a tax collector, thus this gospel does not concern my life and me. The figures of a survey done on taxes; taxpayers and tax collectors could be quite embarrassing. 72% people do not pay taxes fully or partially. They cheat the country and the government. 26% of people pay the full tax, not because they love their country and its development but because of fear of being caught and punished; they are in a search of completely safe ways of evading taxes. The rest 2% are involved in collecting taxes. They cheat the country and people by collecting more and not correctly accounting for it. That leaves us with a 100% of ‘Zacchaeuses’ in our societies. Thus most of us stand in need of salvation for our families and ourselves. Zacchae...

Great Teachers Create Vocal Students

Picture a classroom where questions are met with impatience, where unique perspectives are dismissed, where vulnerable thoughts are cut short. Gradually, hands stop rising, eyes avoid contact, and the once-vibrant space becomes a vacuum of missed opportunities and untapped potential. This silence is not respect—it is retreat, it is a silent protest, and it is dissent. When teachers fail to listen, they unwittingly construct invisible barriers. Students quickly sense when their contributions hold no value, when their voices are merely tolerated rather than treasured. The natural response is self-preservation through silence. Why risk sharing when no one is truly receiving? This silent classroom is a warning sign. A teacher who does not listen will soon be surrounded by students who do not speak. Andy Stanley has spoken about it on leadership, "a leader who does not listen will gradually be surrounded by people who do not speak." It is true in every field, including educatio...

SPRINGBOARDS and WALKING STICKS

Search This Blog